Polina Sleptsova vs Prathyusha Rachapudi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How effective are their second serves? Rachapudi has achieved 35.71% of points on their second serve in the past six months, while Sleptsova has not won any points from this serve.
• In terms of return games, Rachapudi wins 57.18% of opponents' second serves. Sleptsova, however, has not scored on any second serve returns lately.
• How do they fare against first serves? Rachapudi manages to win 32.21% of first-serve returns compared to Sleptsova's 0% success rate.
• When under pressure, Rachapudi saves 48% of breakpoints, demonstrating a strength in critical moments, while Sleptsova has not saved any breakpoints recently.
• Overall yearly performance shows Rachapudi with a 35.9% match win rate contrasted with Sleptsova's 55.56% win rate, indicating Sleptsova's better form over the year.
• Surface preferences reveal Rachapudi excels on Grass (50%), while Sleptsova performs best on Hard courts (54%).
• Level of competition has Rachapudi playing mostly at Challengers/ITF > $10K, winning 38.46%, whereas Sleptsova competes mainly at Futures/ITF $10K events, winning 55.56% of her matches.
• Quality of opponents faced shows Rachapudi's average opponent rank is 364.18, compared to Sleptsova's much higher caliber opponents averaging a rank of 176.22.
• If it goes to a deciding set, Rachapudi has an edge, winning 63% in the last year, compared to Sleptsova's 33% success rate.
• What about break point conversion? Rachapudi converts 46.07% of opportunities, while Sleptsova has been unable to convert any recently.

Editorial Prediction (August 4, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Rachapudi and Sleptsova presents several intriguing factors favoring each player. While Rachapudi has shown a strong performance in critical moments, saving a significant number of breakpoints and converting a considerable percentage of break opportunities, their overall win rate over the past year is notably lower than Sleptsova's. Sleptsova's superior match win rate indicates a consistent ability to secure matches.

Rachapudi demonstrates advantages in return games, particularly on opponents’ second serves, giving them an edge during rallies and exchanges. They also perform better in deciding sets, suggesting resilience in matches extending to the last minute. On the downside, Sleptsova has been unable to win critical points in similar scenarios.

Both players have emerged from different tiers of competitive events, with Sleptsova competing against higher-ranked opponents, which might suggest a readiness to compete at a higher level against Rachapudi. As this match unfolds, these characteristics make a compelling matchup.

While Rachapudi's strengths in service games and under pressure cannot be overlooked, the current trends and Sleptsova's overall match win consistency suggest Sleptsova is more likely to win the upcoming contest.